The Claim Check Reviews All-In Hosts’ Claims Across Eight Episodes

Summary

The Claim Check is an evidence-review archive covering eight regular All-In episodes from August 21 through October 17, 2026, plus a 16-claim comparison with Pivot. It examines 114 All-In claims and 16 Pivot claims, including statements about AI markets, model capabilities, safety, companies, economics, and other current issues. For the latest All-In review, episode #293, Jason Calacanis scored 70/100, David Sacks 55, and Chamath Palihapitiya 50; David Friedberg was absent and received no score. The archive also presents scores over time for episodes #286 through #293, with reviewed-claim counts shown for each host and episode. Its Pivot comparison gives Kara Swisher 70, Jessica Tarlov 60, and Scott Galloway 50, while stating that these samples do not establish a podcast-wide ranking or statistically calibrated accuracy. Scores use rubric v2, which weighs accuracy at 30%, coherence at 20%, evidence support at 20%, calibration at 15%, and evidence balance at 15%; totals are converted to 100 and rounded to the nearest five. The review scope covers selected significant claims rather than overall speaker accuracy, and small score changes are not considered statistically meaningful. Regular reviews select up to 20 claims without speaker quotas, while the archive notes that All-In episodes #286–292 retain 14 claims each and that summit interviews are excluded. Assessments cite primary sources and retrospective context, but attribution relies on automated transcripts that have not been fully audio-audited. The page also warns that forecasts are graded on their support and that absent hosts leave gaps in the trend chart.